Lord of the Flies

by William Golding

The Hired Girl

Laura Amy Schlitz

> Back to 60second Recap® Study Guide Library > 1984

Theme 1: 1984

1984 by George Orwell 60second Recap Decoder Resources PageIn George Orwell’s 1984, the government doesn’t just control things like the media and commodities. It controls truth. It controls your thoughts. It owns you. It is totalitarian.

This is Orwell’s message, and the central theme in 1984: Totalitarianism is the enemy of free thought and the enemy of human rights. It maintains its absolute power at any cost.

Orwell’s message about totalitarianism is stark and short enough to be summed up in two words: Watch out.

1984

George Orwell, 1949
Famous for: Big Brother, doublethink, and some of the 20th century's most memorable quotes: "He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.”

George Orwell isn't the only author with dystopia on his mind. Here's Brave New World by Aldous Huxley.

George Orwell isn’t the only author with dystopia on his mind.
Brave New World by Aldous Huxley.

Recap Five, 1984

Orwell’s Dystopia: Why He Wrote 1984

In 1944, Hitler’s Nazi empire was crumbling under the Allied onslaught. But George Orwell had the future in sight, and he didn’t like what he saw.

Here’s the text of a letter he wrote warning of the rise of a totalitarian police state. Three years later, he wrote a novel around this theme.

Its title: 1984.


Reprinted from George Orwell: A Life in Letters, edited by Peter Davison.

George Orwell in 1944

George Orwell, author of 1984, in 1944.

To Noel Willmett
18 May 1944
10a Mortimer Crescent NW 6

Dear Mr Willmett,

Many thanks for your letter. You ask whether totalitarianism, leader-worship etc. are really on the up-grade and instance the fact that they are not apparently growing in this country and the USA. I must say I believe, or fear, that taking the world as a whole these things are on the increase.

Hitler, no doubt, will soon disappear, but only at the expense of strengthening (a) Stalin, (b) the Anglo-American millionaires and (c) all sorts of petty fuhrers° of the type of de Gaulle. All the national movements everywhere, even those that originate in resistance to German domination, seem to take non-democratic forms, to group themselves round some superhuman fuhrer (Hitler, Stalin, Salazar, Franco, Gandhi, De Valera are all varying examples) and to adopt the theory that the end justifies the means.

Everywhere the world movement seems to be in the direction of centralised economies which can be made to ‘work’ in an economic sense but which are not democratically organised and which tend to establish a caste system. With this go the horrors of emotional nationalism and a tendency to disbelieve in the existence of objective truth because all the facts have to fit in with the words and prophecies of some infallible fuhrer.


1984 by George Orwell Characters 60second Recap

Recap Four,  1984: Characters.

1984 George Orwell Theme 2

Up Next…Recap Six, 1984: Theme 2.


Already history has in a sense ceased to exist, ie. there is no such thing as a history of our own times which could be universally accepted, and the exact sciences are endangered as soon as military necessity ceases to keep people up to the mark. Hitler can say that the Jews started the war, and if he survives that will become official history. He can’t say that two and two are five, because for the purposes of, say, ballistics they have to make four. But if the sort of world that I am afraid of arrives, a world of two or three great superstates which are unable to conquer one another, two and two could become five if the fuhrer wished it.1 That, so far as I can see, is the direction in which we are actually moving, though, of course, the process is reversible.

As to the comparative immunity of Britain and the USA. Whatever the pacifists etc. may say, we have not gone totalitarian yet and this is a very hopeful symptom. I believe very deeply, as I explained in my book The Lion and the Unicorn, in the English people and in their capacity to centralise their economy without destroying freedom in doing so. But one must remember that Britain and the USA haven’t been really tried, they haven’t known defeat or severe suffering, and there are some bad symptoms to balance the good ones. To begin with there is the general indifference to the decay of democracy. Do you realise, for instance, that no one in England under 26 now has a vote and that so far as one can see the great mass of people of that age don’t give a damn for this?

Secondly there is the fact that the intellectuals are more totalitarian in outlook than the common people. On the whole the English intelligentsia have opposed Hitler, but only at the price of accepting Stalin. Most of them are perfectly ready for dictatorial methods, secret police, systematic falsification of history, etc. so long as they feel that it is on ‘our’ side. Indeed the statement that we haven’t a Fascist movement in England largely means that the young, at this moment, look for their fuhrer elsewhere. One can’t be sure that that won’t change, nor can one be sure that the common people won’t think ten years hence as the intellectuals do now. I hope they won’t, I even trust they won’t, but if so it will be at the cost of a struggle. If one simply proclaims that all is for the best and doesn’t point to the sinister symptoms, one is merely helping to bring totalitarianism nearer.

You also ask, if I think the world tendency is towards Fascism, why do I support the war. It is a choice of evils—I fancy nearly every war is that. I know enough of British imperialism not to like it, but I would support it against Nazism or Japanese imperialism, as the lesser evil. Similarly I would support the USSR against Germany because I think the USSR cannot altogether escape its past and retains enough of the original ideas of the Revolution to make it a more hopeful phenomenon than Nazi Germany. I think, and have thought ever since the war began, in 1936 or thereabouts, that our cause is the better, but we have to keep on making it the better, which involves constant criticism.

Yours sincerely,
Geo. Orwell


How to Write an A+ Essay: Thesis StatementsWouldn’t it be great if your essay wrote itself?

Sorry, can’t help you there. But what if I could show you how to save time and trouble with a simple technique for organizing your research? And what if I told you that this strategy would enable you to write your best essay yet?

It’s easier than you think. In How to Write an A+ Paper: A Step by Step Guide to Acing Your Next Assignment, I’ll show you an “on-the-fly” strategy I use for gathering and organizing facts before I begin to write.

Read the introduction here, or grab your copy from Amazon.


 

Like the Recap? Please spread the word :)

RSS
Follow by Email5k
Facebook0
Facebook
Google+0
Google+
http://www.60secondrecap.com/study-guide/george-orwell-1984-theme/">
YouTube14k
YouTube