If the video doesn’t load please try refreshing the page. If the problem persists make sure you have the latest version of the Flash player or watch the videos on our RecAPP iPhone and iPod application.

No, you’re not going crazy. Yes, Ray Bradbury does spend a lot of time contradicting himself in Fahrenheit 451. Why? Because one of Bradbury’s motifs is paradoxes, of course! Click on this video to find out the meaning behind all this contradiction.

Video Transcription:

If you think that Ray Bradbury spends a lot of time contradicting himself, you’d be right. That’s because one of Bradbury’s motifs is paradoxes.

Here’s the thing about the society in Fahrenheit 451: What’s going on on the surface doesn’t match what’s going on beneath the surface.

Like the people Montag comes into contact with. They may seem like they’re living, but they’re soulless—they’re spiritually and emotionally dead.

And Bradbury uses the motif of paradoxes to get at this contradiction.

For example, Montag’s wife, Mildred, is often described as both there and not there. In other words, she’s physically in Montag’s presence, but her thoughts are elsewhere. Mildred and Montag may talk, but she can’t emotionally connect.

Mildred is also described as dead and alive—almost as though she’s a machine. She thinks (because her brain is functioning), but yet she doesn’t really think. She’s alive (because her heart is pumping), but she’s not engaged with the world in any kind of meaningful way.

Ultimately, these paradoxes and others are a constant reminder of the unsubstantiality and unreality (masquerading as substantiality and reality) that both Montag—and his author—are fighting against.